State Computing Workforce Pipeline
California had the largest computing degree and workforce footprint, while state degree-to-opening ratios varied widely.

EduInsightsPublished September 1, 2026 · Public data teamWhere are computing bachelor’s degrees concentrated, and which award period does the comparison use?
California reported 11,310 first-major bachelor’s degrees in computing for awards conferred from July 2022 through June 2023. The analysis keeps that award period separate from the revised 2023–24 IPEDS collection release that contains it. Degree counts describe where colleges reported awards, not where graduates later worked.
Where are software developer, data scientist, and information security analyst jobs concentrated?
California had 339,270 jobs across the three selected careers in May 2025, the largest state total. North Carolina ranked 16th in computing degrees but sixth in selected-career employment, showing why education output and job location should be compared without assuming they measure the same people.
Which states report the strongest long-term growth and the most annual openings?
California had 26,150 projected annual openings across the selected careers. Mississippi had the fastest complete-state projection at 41.5% growth and 420 annual openings. State projection periods and publication coverage are preserved; openings include growth and replacement needs rather than current vacancies.
Do degrees per projected opening identify shortages or surpluses?
No. New Hampshire had 3.43 reported degrees per projected annual opening, while New Mexico had 0.36. The ratio is a descriptive comparison across different populations and periods. It does not account for migration, experienced workers, graduates entering other careers, vacancies, or placement.
What does the combined state education, employment, pay, projections, and AI evidence show?
California has the largest pipeline and workforce footprint
California reported 11,310 computing bachelor’s degrees for the 2022–23 reporting period. It also had 339,270 jobs across the three selected careers in May 2025.
California had 26,150 projected annual openings across those careers for 2024–34.
Mississippi had the fastest complete-state projection, at 41.5% growth from 2024 to 2034. Its projection included 420 annual openings.
Several states show notable differences between education and workforce measures
New Hampshire had 3.43 reported degrees per projected annual opening, the highest observed ratio.
New Mexico had 0.36 reported degrees per projected annual opening, the lowest observed ratio.
North Carolina ranked 16th in computing degrees but 6th in employment across the three careers.
These are descriptive differences, not evidence of shortages or graduate placement. Degrees identify where colleges reported awards, not where graduates worked.
The wage measure is an employment-weighted average of three occupation-specific median wages. It is not a statewide worker median.
Chart colors compare states within each measure. They do not create an overall state ranking. Every downloadable row includes its encoded indicator label.
National AI observations remain separate
The national occupation observations reported AI-use exposure values of 0.486 for Information Security Analysts, 0.461 for Data Scientists, and 0.288 for Software Developers.
These values describe observed Claude use in the source population. They cannot establish state-level AI use, displacement, productivity, or employment effects.
California leads computing degree output and selected-career employment; state comparisons use 2023 degrees, May 2025 jobs and wages, and 2024–34 projections
Heatmap with 51 state or District of Columbia rows and six measure columns. Color shows each state’s percentile within that measure. The measures are computing bachelor’s degrees, employment in three selected careers, an employment-weighted average of occupation median wages, projected growth, projected annual openings, and degrees per projected opening. Every downloadable row includes the encoded indicator label. Colors must not be compared across measures or treated as an overall ranking.
| Measure | State | Percentile among the 50 states and DC | Coverage state |
|---|---|---|---|
| Projected average annual openings | Alabama | 48% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Alaska | 0% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Arizona | 64% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Arkansas | 24% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | California | 92% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Colorado | 82% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Connecticut | 44% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Delaware | 12% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | District of Columbia | 32% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Florida | 86% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Georgia | 70% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Hawaii | 6% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Idaho | 30% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Illinois | 72% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Indiana | 46% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Iowa | 34% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Kansas | 40% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Kentucky | 24% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Louisiana | 16% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Maine | 10% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Maryland | 66% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Massachusetts | 78% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Michigan | 62% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Minnesota | 58% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Mississippi | 14% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Missouri | 56% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Montana | — | No data supplied |
| Projected average annual openings | Nebraska | 38% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Nevada | 22% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | New Hampshire | 28% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | New Jersey | 74% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | New Mexico | 20% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | New York | 84% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | North Carolina | 80% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | North Dakota | 4% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Ohio | 68% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Oklahoma | 36% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Oregon | 52% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Pennsylvania | 76% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Rhode Island | 18% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | South Carolina | 42% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | South Dakota | 8% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Tennessee | 50% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Texas | 90% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Utah | 60% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Vermont | 2% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Virginia | 88% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Washington | — | No data supplied |
| Projected average annual openings | West Virginia | — | No data supplied |
| Projected average annual openings | Wisconsin | 54% | Observed |
| Projected average annual openings | Wyoming | — | No data supplied |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Alabama | 52% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Alaska | 0% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Arizona | 76% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Arkansas | 26% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | California | 100% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Colorado | 66% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Connecticut | 46% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Delaware | 20% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | District of Columbia | 18% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Florida | 90% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Georgia | 84% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Hawaii | 4% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Idaho | 42% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Illinois | 80% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Indiana | 72% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Iowa | 32% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Kansas | 30% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Kentucky | 40% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Louisiana | 36% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Maine | 8% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Maryland | 92% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Massachusetts | 86% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Michigan | 78% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Minnesota | 60% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Mississippi | 14% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Missouri | 56% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Montana | 10% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Nebraska | 38% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Nevada | 22% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | New Hampshire | 62% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | New Jersey | 74% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | New Mexico | 12% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | New York | 98% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | North Carolina | 68% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | North Dakota | 6% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Ohio | 64% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Oklahoma | 34% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Oregon | 54% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Pennsylvania | 88% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Rhode Island | 28% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | South Carolina | 48% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | South Dakota | 16% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Tennessee | 50% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Texas | 96% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Utah | 94% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Vermont | 24% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Virginia | 82% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Washington | 70% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | West Virginia | 44% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Wisconsin | 58% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees | Wyoming | 2% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Alabama | 32% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Alaska | 70% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Arizona | 54% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Arkansas | 58% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | California | 6% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Colorado | 2% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Connecticut | 22% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Delaware | 76% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | District of Columbia | 14% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Florida | 20% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Georgia | 60% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Hawaii | 42% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Idaho | 74% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Illinois | 48% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Indiana | 86% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Iowa | 50% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Kansas | 10% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Kentucky | 78% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Louisiana | 82% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Maine | 18% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Maryland | 84% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Massachusetts | 62% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Michigan | 64% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Minnesota | 30% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Mississippi | 26% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Missouri | 28% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Montana | — | No data supplied |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Nebraska | 44% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Nevada | 38% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | New Hampshire | 92% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | New Jersey | 36% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | New Mexico | 0% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | New York | 66% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | North Carolina | 12% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | North Dakota | 56% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Ohio | 16% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Oklahoma | 52% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Oregon | 40% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Pennsylvania | 72% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Rhode Island | 68% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | South Carolina | 34% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | South Dakota | 80% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Tennessee | 24% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Texas | 8% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Utah | 88% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Vermont | 90% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Virginia | 4% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Washington | — | No data supplied |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | West Virginia | — | No data supplied |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Wisconsin | 46% | Observed |
| Computing bachelor degrees per projected annual opening | Wyoming | — | No data supplied |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Alabama | 40% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Alaska | — | No data supplied |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Arizona | 56% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Arkansas | 10% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | California | 88% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Colorado | 76% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Connecticut | 68% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Delaware | — | No data supplied |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | District of Columbia | 70% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Florida | 60% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Georgia | 54% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Hawaii | 42% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Idaho | — | No data supplied |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Illinois | 58% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Indiana | 6% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Iowa | 20% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Kansas | 18% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Kentucky | 12% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Louisiana | 2% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Maine | 22% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Maryland | 80% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Massachusetts | 82% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Michigan | 38% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Minnesota | 62% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Mississippi | 0% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Missouri | 30% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Montana | 26% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Nebraska | 14% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Nevada | 28% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | New Hampshire | 74% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | New Jersey | 78% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | New Mexico | 50% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | New York | 84% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | North Carolina | 66% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | North Dakota | 8% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Ohio | 24% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Oklahoma | 16% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Oregon | — | No data supplied |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Pennsylvania | 44% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Rhode Island | 46% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | South Carolina | 36% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | South Dakota | 4% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Tennessee | 34% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Texas | 64% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Utah | 52% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Vermont | 48% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Virginia | 72% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Washington | 86% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | West Virginia | — | No data supplied |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Wisconsin | 32% | Observed |
| Employment-weighted median annual wage | Wyoming | — | No data supplied |
| Projected employment growth | Alabama | 42% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Alaska | 0% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Arizona | 72% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Arkansas | 74% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | California | 60% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Colorado | 90% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Connecticut | 32% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Delaware | 14% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | District of Columbia | 4% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Florida | 86% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Georgia | 62% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Hawaii | 26% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Idaho | 78% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Illinois | 10% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Indiana | 84% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Iowa | 46% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Kansas | 28% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Kentucky | 2% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Louisiana | 64% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Maine | 54% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Maryland | 50% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Massachusetts | 18% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Michigan | 16% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Minnesota | 12% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Mississippi | 92% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Missouri | 52% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Montana | — | No data supplied |
| Projected employment growth | Nebraska | 36% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Nevada | 58% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | New Hampshire | 24% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | New Jersey | 20% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | New Mexico | 82% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | New York | 6% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | North Carolina | 44% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | North Dakota | 56% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Ohio | 22% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Oklahoma | 48% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Oregon | 34% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Pennsylvania | 38% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Rhode Island | 30% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | South Carolina | 76% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | South Dakota | 66% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Tennessee | 68% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Texas | 88% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Utah | 80% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Vermont | 8% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Virginia | 70% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Washington | — | No data supplied |
| Projected employment growth | West Virginia | — | No data supplied |
| Projected employment growth | Wisconsin | 40% | Observed |
| Projected employment growth | Wyoming | — | No data supplied |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Alabama | 50% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Alaska | 0% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Arizona | 66% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Arkansas | 28% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | California | 96% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Colorado | 70% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Connecticut | 44% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Delaware | 16% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | District of Columbia | 30% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Florida | 86% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Georgia | 78% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Hawaii | 6% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Idaho | 26% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Illinois | 80% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Indiana | 48% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Iowa | 38% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Kansas | 42% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Kentucky | 36% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Louisiana | 18% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Maine | 14% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Maryland | 64% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Massachusetts | 76% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Michigan | 68% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Minnesota | 62% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Mississippi | 10% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Missouri | 56% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Montana | 8% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Nebraska | 34% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Nevada | 24% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | New Hampshire | 40% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | New Jersey | 74% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | New Mexico | 22% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | New York | 92% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | North Carolina | 84% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | North Dakota | 2% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Ohio | 72% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Oklahoma | 32% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Oregon | 54% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Pennsylvania | 82% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Rhode Island | 20% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | South Carolina | 46% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | South Dakota | 12% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Tennessee | 52% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Texas | 94% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Utah | 60% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Vermont | 4% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Virginia | 88% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Washington | 90% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | West Virginia | — | No data supplied |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Wisconsin | 58% | Observed |
| Employment in three target computing careers | Wyoming | — | No data supplied |

