EduInsightsPublic intelligence

Program Futures · design study 01

One verified program.
Five ways to show its future.

The research run now has what the earlier scorecard lacked: source-exact course evidence, a seven-criterion composite, public earnings and debt, and a passed citation audit. These prototypes explore how that richer record could become a useful public card.

ProgramComputer Science, B.S.
InstitutionUNC Greensboro
CompositeStrong
AuditPassed · 41 citations

Five prototypes · one evaluation

Every concept uses the same scored run. The hierarchy changes for the audience; the evidence, caveats, and composite do not.

Viewing 01 / 05

Program Futures / verified evaluation

University of North Carolina at Greensboro

Computer Science, B.S.

A strong computing core with required ethics and capstone practice. Hands-on AI is available, but not yet a universal part of the degree.

CompositeStrongComparison ready
One-year earnings$59,772n=66 · broader CIP-4 cohort
Four-year earnings$86,372n=77 · separate cohort
Median debt$24,403n=68 · inherited field outcome
Evidence audit41 checkedNo blocking findings

Seven-criterion profile

AI fluency96% confidence
Moderate
Data + computational thinking98% confidence
Strong
Critical judgment87% confidence
Moderate
Domain expertise98% confidence
Strong
Ethics + responsibility98% confidence
Strong
Applied practice95% confidence
Strong
Adaptability95% confidence
Moderate
Catalog 2026-2027CIP 11.0701Rubric v0.3Market evidence informs the narrative—not the curriculum score.

The invariant

Change the hierarchy, never the evidence boundary.

Curriculum scores come from direct program evidence. Earnings, debt, occupation demand, and observed AI use remain separate context. Any selected direction can expand into the full 41-citation dossier.

View the Wake Forest Engineering evidence card →Open the official catalog ↗Back to EduInsights